Dissertation/Thesis Discussion Chapter Template
Opening/Intro Section
In the first
section of your discussion chapter, you should remind the reader of the golden
thread underpinning (research
aims, objectives and questions) your dissertation or thesis.
In this section,
you’ll should aim to write a concise paragraph that includes the following:
●
A sentence repeating your specific
research problem
●
A sentence or two repeating your
research aims, objectives, and questions
●
If you have hypotheses, you can
also briefly mention these.
●
A sentence or two reminding the
reader of the methodology you used in your study
●
A sentence indicating the purpose
of this chapter
● A sentence outlining the layout of the chapter
Keep in mind that
this is purely an opening section, so don’t get too detailed. Keep it short.
Overview of
Key Findings
In this section,
you’ll need to present a summary of the key findings from your study in one or
two concise yet cohesive paragraphs. The key findings are those that directly
relate to your original research questions (and your golden thread in general).
This section may
look different for qualitative and quantitative research projects. For example,
qualitative research may report on themes and concepts, whereas quantitative
research may touch on correlations and causal relationships.
Regardless of the
methodology, your goal here is to highlight the overall key findings in
relation to your research questions. For example, if your research questions
asked what the antecedents of a certain outcome were, you’d need to outline the
relevant antecedents in this section. Some examples of the kind of language
you’d use here include:
●
The data suggest that…
●
The data support/oppose the theory
that…
● The analysis identifies…
Importantly, this
section is only an overview, not an in-depth discussion. You’ll get into that
in the next section. So, keep it concise here and lay a foundation for the next
section.
Interpretation
of Findings
This section will
typically be the longest one in the chapter, as this is where you’ll spend time
unpacking and interpreting your findings and explaining what they mean within
your context. In your previous chapter (the results chapter), you purely described
the data, whereas in this chapter you will explain what it means in relation to
the golden thread.
An important note – everything
you discuss in this chapter needs to be rooted in data that you presented in
your previous chapter (i.e., the results chapter). So, make sure that you only
include in this chapter what you reported in your results chapter – don’t
introduce new information. If you need to, you can always go back and expand
upon your results chapter so that there is a strong foundation for the
discussion chapter.
At its core, the
goal of this section is to assess how your findings compare to those of the
existing research (i.e., the studies cited in your literature review chapter).
By doing this, you’ll communicate what the data means in your context, and
you’ll position it in relation to existing studies (i.e., does it align or
misalign with existing research?).
Keep in mind that
even if your findings contrast with the existing research, you still need to
include these in your discussion. In fact, findings that contrast with the
existing literature are often the most interesting and noteworthy, so don’t shy
away from these. They can be fantastic mark earners.
Below are a few
questions to help guide your discussion in this section:
●
How do your findings relate with
those of previous studies?
●
If your findings differ from those
of previous studies, why may this be the case?
●
What do your findings contribute
to your field of research?
● What other explanations could there be for your findings?
When interpreting
your findings, be careful not to draw conclusions that aren’t substantiated by
the data (in the results chapter). Every claim you make needs to be backed up
with evidence or findings from the data. Of course, data can be interpreted in many
ways, so be careful not to be overly zealous in your claims, but at the same
time, don’t shy away from interpreting meaning.
In terms of the
structure of this section, this will partly depend on whether your research
methodology was quantitative, qualitative or mixed, but there are still a few
common options.
●
One way is to structure this
section similarly to how you structured the results chapter. This could be by
research question, variables or groups of variables.
● Another option is to structure it according to a specific
theoretical framework, if you have one.
Ultimately, you
should aim to have a strong alignment between the results and discussion
chapters, so that the reader can bounce between the two fairly easily, should
they want to revisit the supporting data. So, it often makes sense to mimic the
preceding chapter’s structure to a certain degree.
Closing
Summary
In this section,
you’ll want to provide a brief summary of the key findings – in other words,
the findings that directly address your research questions. This will be very
similar to the “overview of key findings” but a bit more concise, as you’re
just recapping on what was already presented.
When writing this concluding summary, keep in mind that some readers may skip straight to this section from the beginning of the chapter. So, make sure that this section flows well from and has a strong connection to the opening section of the chapter.

Comments
Post a Comment